Well it`s just the British way of understatement. If an online race is described as "a bit rough" then translate that to "total and utter carnage".Originally Posted by Lance
I do think there`s a bit of over-reaction going on here, though. Firstly, as Lance also said:
Nintendo and Microsoft are generally thought to charge a lot more for DLC, and I think this is true. I`m very surprised at how much Sony are charging, and I think they`ll come to realise it`s not a good move.Sony is not the only corporation that behaves like this; it is the standard mode of operation for corporations. You should be used to it by now. It is of course, still evil.
And secondly, if somebody could point me to the part that said all the DLC would be free, I`d be glad to admit that Sony has broken some sort of contract or Act of Parliament. Pure did not create any precedent. As Lance said, and I`m not getting the quote marks out again, Pure was just a way of trialling the service. If you don`t like DLC, get out of 21st century gaming. It`s just that the price is too high for what we`re being sold, and they deserve a bit of flack for that. I`ve noticed even on Eurogamer they`re moaning about the price, so it`s not just us. But then, equally, there are some people who expect to get things for nothing because it doesn`t suit them to shell out, and with those people Sony can never win.
Reply With Quote