Page 51 of 99 FirstFirst ... 4147484950515253545561 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 510 of 981

Thread: Release date (merged)

  1. #501
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Belgium
    PSN ID
    ByteHawk
    Posts
    46

    Default

    yes, indeed you clearly notice the difference

    I'd just like to add one thing : You notice the difference between 30fps and 60fps too, imho this is more important than full hd.

  2. #502
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    eLhabib
    Posts
    4,276

    Default

    definitely for a game like wipEout.

  3. #503
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    Odd that the only game that has had 60 FPS in series history has been called the worst of them all by most of the 'Zoners...

  4. #504
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Australia/SA
    Timezone
    GMT + 9.5
    Posts
    16

    Default

    Just Checking, isnt that F-Zero X?

  5. #505
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    On my PC, usually on these forums
    PSN ID
    humangoogle -OFW-
    Posts
    638

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RJ O'Connell View Post
    Odd that the only game that has had 60 FPS in series history has been called the worst of them all by most of the 'Zoners...
    +10 to that (if I could), from what I've seen, wipeout works best when limited hardware-wise.
    @quasi, fusion was 60 FPS as well

  6. #506
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    eLhabib
    Posts
    4,276

    Default

    I guess my emotions towards Fusion are playing tricks on me, because I sure remember it to be not very smooth... jeez, maybe I should go back to playing it once in a while. Maybe I was just blinded by the complete lack of wipEout style...

  7. #507
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Marseille, South Of France
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    ColdRemS
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Well, in fact it wasn't all the time...
    Last edited by ColdRem'S; 7th July 2008 at 06:44 PM.

  8. #508
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ontario, CANADA
    Timezone
    GMT -5
    PSN ID
    dobyblue
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BaldyCurly View Post
    720p/1080p makes very little difference unless you have a 50" plazma or a projector setup.
    That's not true - 1080p makes a difference depending on your viewing distance and screen size.

    On a 22" LCD monitor at 2-3 ft with a resolution of 1920x1200 1080p makes a noticeable difference over 720p.

    On a 50" plasma at 20ft 1080p makes little to no difference over 720p.

    Without viewing distance taken into account, generalizations are meaningless.


  9. #509
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Montréal
    Timezone
    GMT -5
    PSN ID
    Darkdrium777
    Posts
    4,551

    Default

    If this graph was correct, that means I should not see any difference between 480p and 1080p if I sit 12 feet (3.6 meters) away from my TV (I am in the blue triangle, and have a Sharp Aquos 32" 1080p). The big problem is that I see a HUGE difference. 408p is barely watchable at any distance IMO. And my TV upscales it too...
    Last edited by Darkdrium777; 7th July 2008 at 10:06 PM.

  10. #510
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Timezone
    GMT + 10
    PSN ID
    radiumx
    Posts
    1,499

    Default

    Fusion was definitely not 60 FPS - and couldn't have been if you lived in Europe - 50 hz anyone?
    It may have seemed smooth because the game used slowdown instead of frame skipping.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •