Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 42

Thread: I picked up Fusion yesterday...

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    Posts
    89

    Default I picked up Fusion yesterday...

    ...for 5 dollars. Anyway I don't know why you guys don't like Fusion very much, it's just done a bit differently than some of the other Wipeouts. One thing I don't like is how the ships handle differantly. This is wipeout not some other racing game!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    eLhabib
    Posts
    4,395

    Default

    And that's also the major concern most of us have with Fusion.
    Personally, I also think that the logo design, ship design, and overall presentation are heavily flawed, but your mileage may vary.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    You just answered the question in your post.

    The handling feels nothing like any other installment. It was done partly in response to novice players who felt the learning curve was too steep. Sadly it just alienated the veterans. Plus, the PAL version was so bug-loaded it was almost unplayable, even in the NTSC game which was delayed because it didn't have a publisher for so long there were still some odd glitches.

    However, it introduced some new teams that can co-exist well with the "elite eight" of Wipeout 3 (and have), it had one of the most immersive backstories, and it was a very ambitious game in general. Shame it didn't execute as well, it would have kept the franchise on the PS2 or at least become an instant classic. :/

    Oops, seems like someone answered your question before I did XD Hi eL.
    Last edited by RJ O'Connell; 1st September 2008 at 09:33 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Well they sure as hell made it accessible, I talked my brother into playing multiplayer today and he owned at it within 5 minutes. On the other hand, I sucked due to my familiarity with Pulse.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    Yes it is very novice friendly, and with two-player split screen it's a good multiplayer game for any skill level.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fairfield (between San Francisco and Sacramento), California, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -8
    Posts
    59

    Default

    I never have understood in the slightest the mass dislike for Wipeout Fusion. I think it's a really good Wipeout game with awesome speed, graphics & music. The controls seem a little different from the previous Wipeouts, but nothing that hindered my experience much at all... That said, why isn't Wipeout Fusion in the Records section!?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Timezone
    GMT + 10
    PSN ID
    radiumx
    Posts
    1,500

    Default

    Too hard to keep track of - upgrade levels, etc plus the bugs which made you respawn at the finish line kinda prohibit good record making.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    The only way I know of would be an "all or nothing" approach - either leave the ships at stock (Vector) or 100% upgraded (Phantom) and either way Piranha would own all the top times. (Not that I'm hating on Piranha in any way )

    Just tried it with the neG today, definitely an improvement.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    PSN ID
    flashbax1
    Posts
    70

    Default

    When u get enuff credits u can unlock all the other pilots just by upgrading the first ship of each team...just something to do when your bored lol..I like fusion TBH the big bulky ships r something diffrent and the sound tracks a cracker

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Between the gloss and the reality, Japan
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    kiTTun
    Posts
    1,964

    Cool

    I'd love it if it was called simply "Fusion". I dislike it because it does not fit the title "Wipeout" that it carries. Zone mode good. Game mode fun and easy, but not wipeout. Therefore bad.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    It's definitely as fast as WO3 at Phantom (greyscale prototype) class.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    Posts
    89

    Cool

    Some series have their black sheep, and this was WipEout's black sheep. WipEout 2097 is to WipEout Fusion as Zelda 1 is to Zelda 2. All series have these.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Fairfield (between San Francisco and Sacramento), California, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -8
    Posts
    59

    Default

    Hmm, I wonder does the hate of Fusion have something to do with the fact that the PAL version is MUCH more buggy than the NTSC version!? That's what I heard anyway. I've played my US NTSC version of Fusion a LOT and have hardly noticed any bugs etc... The only thing I really notice is at the start of the race when the camera pans over the ships, it's kinda jerky. It doesn't bother me.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    That would also be a factor.

    Now I'm glad it took so long for the game to find a publisher here - SL could work out the bugs, such as the dreaded "starting grid system epic fail" bug where your PS2 melts if you don't skip over the starting grid sequence.*

    *It's not quite that bad.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    9,850

    Default

    I suspect that the behaviour I've heard of where it seems the racecraft feel like they're on noiseless steel spheres rolling on glass at a constant fixed height above the visible surface might have something to do with it. If it ain't floaty, it ain't WipEout. It's F-Zero instead. I've played a computer sim of the original F-Zero. It was horrible. I hated the feel of it. No float, no low-flying airplane feel. Blech!

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Florence, AL, USA
    Timezone
    GMT -6
    PSN ID
    blinky77
    Posts
    1,926

    Default

    They still pivot from the rear unlike any game made after Pure. So it's not quite like driving a car without wheels.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    3,447

    Default

    The game itself shows you your race time, but there are no records kept in game of your best times, which is assinine. Also, (possible spoiler you, (stop reading if you don't want the game completely wrecked) It is faster to ride the walls around a corner than to make the corner perfectly, and with only 3 laps, the control does not get bad enough to make is slower. In my tourney, I put the lap count to 5 to make racing correctly a neccesity, but we did not have time to play fusion at the end.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    sausehuhn
    Posts
    3,329

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lance View Post
    [...]rolling on glass at a constant fixed height above the visible surface might have something to do with it. If it ain't floaty, it ain't WipEout.[...]
    You mean just like in WOPure and WOPulse? Lance, since WO3 there was no WipEout game that brought back the old school feeling. The ships do not turn at the back anymore, the ships do not change height if you press up or down, the ships do not press down their rears at hard turning. That's all gone.
    To be honest: Pure and Pulse do - IMO - not differ that much from Fusion as anybody says.

    I still don't understand why the ship's turning point is now at the center and not at the back (where the engine is). And the float is all gone as well. It's more like one-time-bumping after a jump, crashing the nose into the track surface once to gain the standard height again.
    Pure and Pulse do not have the track-lock (except for Magstrips, that is) so the ship can do jumps. But that alone does not make it feel floaty.

    WOHD vids looked more floaty. And I hope the game really is.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    9,850

    Default

    I never said that I think that Pure and Pulse are WipEout.



    .... Better than Fusion? Okay. ....

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Timezone
    GMT + 1
    PSN ID
    sausehuhn
    Posts
    3,329

    Default

    Hah! I know you didn't
    Anyway, here's a graphic which is self-explanatory.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •