yes, indeed you clearly notice the difference
I'd just like to add one thing : You notice the difference between 30fps and 60fps too, imho this is more important than full hd.
Printable View
yes, indeed you clearly notice the difference
I'd just like to add one thing : You notice the difference between 30fps and 60fps too, imho this is more important than full hd.
definitely for a game like wipEout.
Odd that the only game that has had 60 FPS in series history has been called the worst of them all by most of the 'Zoners...
Just Checking, isnt that F-Zero X?
I guess my emotions towards Fusion are playing tricks on me, because I sure remember it to be not very smooth... jeez, maybe I should go back to playing it once in a while. Maybe I was just blinded by the complete lack of wipEout style...
Well, in fact it wasn't all the time...:dizzy
That's not true - 1080p makes a difference depending on your viewing distance and screen size.
On a 22" LCD monitor at 2-3 ft with a resolution of 1920x1200 1080p makes a noticeable difference over 720p.
On a 50" plasma at 20ft 1080p makes little to no difference over 720p.
Without viewing distance taken into account, generalizations are meaningless.
http://rob-the.geek.nz/wp-content/up...tion_chart.png
If this graph was correct, that means I should not see any difference between 480p and 1080p if I sit 12 feet (3.6 meters) away from my TV (I am in the blue triangle, and have a Sharp Aquos 32" 1080p). The big problem is that I see a HUGE difference. 408p is barely watchable at any distance IMO. And my TV upscales it too...
Fusion was definitely not 60 FPS - and couldn't have been if you lived in Europe - 50 hz anyone?
It may have seemed smooth because the game used slowdown instead of frame skipping.